Join Us: http://bit.ly/joincloud
Showing posts with label Public Cloud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Public Cloud. Show all posts
Monday, 11 October 2010
Can We Kill The Terms Private, Public, and Hybrid Cloud?
It's time to rant about the use of the terms Private, Public, and Hybrid when it comes to Cloud Computing. I hate the terms, and think the sooner they disappear, the better Cloud can live long and prosper.
Hybrid is a great term for corn; less good for IT. With corn, it describes a decades-long, ongoing effort to improve yield and feed more people in the process. It is a genetic hybrid with a single goal.
With IT, and specifically with Cloud, the term Hybrid is the squishiest of all terms. It means nothing. Public and private are less squishy perhaps, but often used in a way that only confuses people.
Let's Take a LookWithin an Enterprise Cloud you'll find the corporate HR intranet (inc. the company directory, outline of benefits, insurance claim forms, tally of vacation days, personal IRA and related statements, and pictures from the joy-filled company picnic), the accounting software (including the dreaded expense account app), all the engineering stuff, and the supply-chain management system.
Within the Consumer Cloud, you'll find the corporate website, and with it, your online commerce system if you have one. The latter runs to everything from the hardy originals (eg, Amazon and eBay) to iTunes, Expedia, and anything else you would buy online.
Most companies will, therefore, have an Enterprise Cloud and a Consumer Cloud. They may have significant on-site IT, but farm out the website to an ISP. They may have significant on-site IT, but mirror it with Akamai and have Akamai do the heavy lifting to deliver video.
They may have abstracted and virtualized some or all of their online IT, utilizing their capacity more effectively and consolidating a number of servers. They have also contracted with a third-party to handle seasonal spike
Labels:
Cloud Computing,
Hybrid,
Private Clouds,
Public Cloud
Wednesday, 22 September 2010
Public vs. Private Clouds
Christian Perry has an article in Processor Magazine that I contributed some quotes to. The article is about the ongoing debate about the merits of public and private clouds in the enterprise.
One of the assertions that VMWare made at last week’s VMWorld conference is that secure hybrid clouds are the future for enterprise IT. This is a sentiment I agree with. But I also see the private part of the hybrid cloud as an excellent stepping stone to public clouds. Most future enterprise cloud apps will reside in the hybrid cloud; however, there will always be some applications, such as bursty web apps, that can benefit tremendously from the basic economics of public clouds.
http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/node/1528535
Join Us: http://bit.ly/joincloud
One of the assertions that VMWare made at last week’s VMWorld conference is that secure hybrid clouds are the future for enterprise IT. This is a sentiment I agree with. But I also see the private part of the hybrid cloud as an excellent stepping stone to public clouds. Most future enterprise cloud apps will reside in the hybrid cloud; however, there will always be some applications, such as bursty web apps, that can benefit tremendously from the basic economics of public clouds.
http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/node/1528535
Join Us: http://bit.ly/joincloud
Thursday, 3 June 2010
Why IT Needs to Take Control of Public Cloud Computing
IT organizations that fail to provide guidance for and governance over public cloud computing usage will be unhappy with the results…
While it is highly unlikely that business users will "control their own destiny" by provisioning servers in cloud computing environments that doesn't mean they won't be involved. In fact it's likely that IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) cloud computing environments will be leveraged by business users to avoid the hassles they perceive (and oft times actually do) exist in their quest to deploy a given business application. It's just that they won't themselves be pushing the buttons.
There have been many experts that have expounded upon the ways in which cloud computing is forcing a shift within IT and the way in which assets are provisioned, acquired, and managed. One of those shifts is likely to also occur "outside" of IT with external IT-focused services, such as system integrators like CSC andEDS HP Enterprise Services.
The use of SaaS by business users is a foregone conclusion. It makes sense. Unfortunately SaaS is generally available only for highly commoditized business functions. That means more niche applications are unlikely to be offered SaaS because of the diseconomy of scale factors involved with such a small market. But that does not mean that businesses aren't going to acquire and utilize those applications. On the contrary, it is just this market that is ripe for Paul the SI to leverage.
For example, assume a business unit needed application X, but application X is very specific to their industry and not offered as SaaS by any provider today – and is unlikely to be offered as such in the future due to its limited addressable market. But IT is overburdened with other projects and may not have the time – or resources – available until some "later" point in time. A savvy SI at this point would recognize the potential of marrying IaaS with this niche-market software and essentially turning it into a SaaS-style, IaaS-deployed solution. An even savvier SI will have already partnered with a select group of cloud computing providers to enable this type of scenario to happen even more seamlessly. There's quite a few systems' integrators that are already invested in cloud computing, so the ones that aren't will be at a distinct disadvantage if they don't have preferred partners and can provide potential customers with details that will assuage any residual concerns regarding security and transparency.
Similarly, a savvy IT org will recognize the same potential and consider whether or not they can support the business initiative themselves or get behind the use of public cloud computing as an option under the right circumstances. IT needs to understand what types of applications can and cannot be deployed in a public cloud computing environment and provide that guidance to business units. An even savvier IT org might even refuse to locally deploy applications that are well-suited to a public IaaS deployment and reserve IT resources for applications that simply aren't suited to public deployment. IT needs to provide governance and guidance for its business customers. IT needs to be, as Jay Fry put it so well in a recent post on this subject, "a trusted advisor."
Join Us: http://bit.ly/joincloud
While it is highly unlikely that business users will "control their own destiny" by provisioning servers in cloud computing environments that doesn't mean they won't be involved. In fact it's likely that IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) cloud computing environments will be leveraged by business users to avoid the hassles they perceive (and oft times actually do) exist in their quest to deploy a given business application. It's just that they won't themselves be pushing the buttons.
There have been many experts that have expounded upon the ways in which cloud computing is forcing a shift within IT and the way in which assets are provisioned, acquired, and managed. One of those shifts is likely to also occur "outside" of IT with external IT-focused services, such as system integrators like CSC and
ROBBING PETER to PAY PAUL
The use of SaaS by business users is a foregone conclusion. It makes sense. Unfortunately SaaS is generally available only for highly commoditized business functions. That means more niche applications are unlikely to be offered SaaS because of the diseconomy of scale factors involved with such a small market. But that does not mean that businesses aren't going to acquire and utilize those applications. On the contrary, it is just this market that is ripe for Paul the SI to leverage.
Similarly, a savvy IT org will recognize the same potential and consider whether or not they can support the business initiative themselves or get behind the use of public cloud computing as an option under the right circumstances. IT needs to understand what types of applications can and cannot be deployed in a public cloud computing environment and provide that guidance to business units. An even savvier IT org might even refuse to locally deploy applications that are well-suited to a public IaaS deployment and reserve IT resources for applications that simply aren't suited to public deployment. IT needs to provide governance and guidance for its business customers. IT needs to be, as Jay Fry put it so well in a recent post on this subject, "a trusted advisor."
So what things would IT need to be able to do in order to help business users make the best IT sourcing choices, regardless of what the final answer is? They'd need to do less of what they've typically done – manually making sure the low-level components are working the way that are supposed to – and become more of a trusted adviser to the business.IT needs to be aware that it may be advantageous to use IaaS as a deployment environment for applications acquired by business units when it's not possible or necessary to deploy locally. Because if Peter the CIO doesn't, Paul the SI will.
Thinking about IT as a supply chain creates new management challenges
Jay Fry (formerly VP of Marketing for Cassatt, now with CA)
Join Us: http://bit.ly/joincloud
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
